Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and London 2024, Sophie Jarvis lost 0:49 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:50 quicker, so 2:01 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 8 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:03:30 PB11/146Beat 93%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed59:38 PB8/297Beat 97%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:04:2221/339Beat 94%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:05:36 PB6/411Beat 99%
↑ 271 days after Manchester 2025, with Pippa Scott 0:32 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:03 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:35 faster for everyone, so 0:32 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:35 faster This pair2:03 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:3221/841Beat 98%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:07:3943/857Beat 95%
-
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:12:02 PB18/940Beat 98%
↑ 35 days after Birmingham 2024 0:49 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:01 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:50 faster for everyone, so 0:49 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:50 faster This athlete2:01 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:14:0319/564Beat 97%