Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Manchester 2026, Jane Heathwood lost 1:00 to the field.
The clock says 3:19 slower, but the races themselves got 2:19 slower for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:1957/842Beat 93%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:18:2919/83Beat 77%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 1:00 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:19 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:19 slower for everyone: 1:00 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:19 slower This athlete3:19 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:15:10 PB53/283Beat 81%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:51107/892Beat 88%
↑ 56 days after Malaga 2025, with Dean Mason 2:34 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:34 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:08 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:34 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:08 faster This pair1:34 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:05:2595/693Beat 86%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:22 PB4/494Beat 99%
-
World Championships NiceDate unknownIndividual Pro · Women1:15:58186/677Beat 73%