Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2024 and Manchester 2026, Amber Aldrich and Maia Hawkins lost 0:44 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:20 quicker, so 4:36 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Bologna4 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:58 PB11/359Beat 97%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:06:1224/1155Beat 98%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with Maia Hawkins 0:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:56 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:02 slower for everyone: 0:54 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:02 slower This pair1:56 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:04:16 PB17/1887Beat 99%
↑ 390 days after Manchester 2024, with Maia Hawkins 0:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:10 better than the field: 6:32 faster on the clock, against 6:22 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →6:22 faster This pair6:32 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:10:4848/486Beat 90%