Progress against the field
Jack Holmes has dropped 1:49 behind the field from London Excel 2025 to EMEA London Olympia 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 1:23 quicker, so 0:26 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:12:30475/958Beat 50%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025 1:49 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:26 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:23 faster for everyone: 1:49 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 faster This athlete0:26 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:56 PB460/1198Beat 62%
↑ 364 days after Glasgow 2025, with Katelynn Agnew 0:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:31 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:18 faster for everyone, so 0:47 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 faster This pair0:31 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:12:04 PB498/2771Beat 82%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:27391/841Beat 54%
-
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Doubles Pro · Men1:26:18 PB101/117Beat 14%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Pro · Men1:32:05117/122Beat 4%