Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to London Olympia 2026, Alice Griffiths got 13:59 faster than the field.
The clock says 15:23 faster, but the races themselves got 1:24 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:16:27 PB56/581Beat 90%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025 13:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
15:23 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:24 faster for everyone, so 13:59 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:24 faster This athlete15:23 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:14 PB63/1599Beat 96%
↑ 215 days after London 2025, with Niamh O Connor 1:01 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:08 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:09 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:01 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This pair1:08 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:31:50655/1379Beat 53%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:09:2259/1118Beat 95%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:13:1441/264Beat 85%
-
Red Bull Monday Night shift: HYROX InvitationalDate unknownDoubles Open · Women1:11:2312/50Beat 76%