Progress against the field
From Manchester 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 0:57 on Mark Baddeley.
Over the same races everyone got 6:01 quicker, so 5:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:02:56 PB24/206Beat 88%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men57:08 PB32/279Beat 89%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men58:40 PB9/2771Beat 100%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 0:24 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:38 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:02 faster for everyone, so 0:24 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:02 faster This athlete3:38 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:1815/1401Beat 99%
↑ 126 days after Manchester 2025 0:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:26 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:59 faster for everyone, so 0:33 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:59 faster This athlete1:26 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:4451/1191Beat 96%