Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2024 to Glasgow 2025, the field gained 1:11 on Ross Gillespie.
The clock says 5:24 faster, but the races themselves got 6:35 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Relay · Men1:03:2822/58Beat 62%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:12:50445/917Beat 52%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:02:59 PB195/1105Beat 82%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Greg Paterson 0:13 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:13 better than the field: 3:04 faster on the clock, against 2:51 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:51 faster This pair3:04 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:18:41 PB608/1588Beat 62%
↑ 375 days after Glasgow 2024 1:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:24 faster on the clock, yet the race was 6:35 faster for everyone, so 1:11 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:35 faster This athlete5:24 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:06:03108/441Beat 76%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:24:05770/1784Beat 57%