Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to Birmingham 2025, Pamela Wilson got 4:19 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:46 quicker, so 6:05 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 8 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:15:25 PB187/1618Beat 88%
↑ 739 days after Glasgow 2024, with Angela Wilson 0:43 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 better than the field: 4:31 faster on the clock, against 3:48 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:48 faster This pair4:31 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:19:44 PB110/222Beat 51%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:26:49459/719Beat 36%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:33:35 PB187/380Beat 51%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 4:19 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:05 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:46 faster for everyone, so 4:19 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 faster This athlete6:05 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:39:40431/587Beat 27%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:34:30571/796Beat 28%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:19:56212/1029Beat 79%
-
Madrid23 Sep 2023Doubles Open · Women1:21:4877/228Beat 66%