Progress against the field
From Heerenveen 2025 to Amsterdam 2026, the field gained 10:15 on Eva De Mol.
Over the same races everyone got 3:37 quicker, so 6:38 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:00 PB67/687Beat 90%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:24:5476/128Beat 41%
↑ 257 days after Heerenveen 2025 10:15 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:15 behind the field: 6:38 slower on the clock, against 3:37 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:37 faster This athlete6:38 slower -
Heerenveen9 May 2025Individual Pro · Women1:18:16 PB16/105Beat 85%
-
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Individual Open · Women1:13:1818/506Beat 96%
↑ 140 days after Amsterdam 2024 4:28 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:39 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:49 faster for everyone: 4:28 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:49 faster This athlete1:39 slower -
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:11:39 PB9/408Beat 98%