Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 0:16 on Ellen Keynes.
Over the same races everyone got 3:06 quicker, so 2:50 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:18 PB79/581Beat 86%
↑ 406 days after Poznan 2024, with Daniel Summerscales 8:35 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:27 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:52 faster for everyone, so 8:35 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:52 faster This pair9:27 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:35:15 PB987/1542Beat 36%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025 0:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:50 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:06 faster for everyone, so 0:16 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:06 faster This athlete2:50 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:38:05551/830Beat 34%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:16377/733Beat 49%
-
Poznan2 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:45160/275Beat 42%