Progress against the field
Between London 2025 and London Excel 2025, Kate Holifield and Sarah Aylett lost 5:34 to the field.
The clock says 0:44 slower, but the races themselves got 4:50 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:46200/1887Beat 89%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Sarah Aylett 0:54 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:24 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, so 0:54 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair3:24 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:15:12 PB32/96Beat 67%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:10183/1111Beat 84%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025, with Sarah Aylett 5:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:03 behind the field: 3:51 slower on the clock, against 1:12 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:12 faster This pair3:51 slower -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:1958/529Beat 89%
↑ 27 days after London 2025, with Sarah Aylett 1:25 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:25 behind the field: 0:17 slower on the clock, against 1:08 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:08 faster This pair0:17 slower -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:02 PB91/1118Beat 92%