Progress against the field
Between London 2025 and London Excel 2025, Liz Spendiff and Anna Coppel lost 1:09 to the field.
The clock says 1:00 faster, but the races themselves got 2:09 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Anna Coppel, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:14:22 PB315/1887Beat 83%
↑ 215 days after London 2025, with Anna Coppel 1:09 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:00 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:09 faster for everyone, so 1:09 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This pair1:00 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:22214/1118Beat 81%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:21:16371/973Beat 62%
↑ 174 days after Sports Direct HYROX London 2024, with Emma Maggott 1:51 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:35 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:16 faster for everyone: 1:51 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:16 faster This pair1:35 slower -
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Doubles Open · Women1:19:41432/1419Beat 70%