Progress against the field
Between London 2024 and Madrid 2025, Amber Hollands lost 3:33 to the field.
The clock says 1:23 faster, but the races themselves got 4:56 quicker for everyone.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 182 days between London 2024 and Cardiff 2025, cost 3:27 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:45 PB598/1887Beat 68%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Ebony Hollands 0:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:29 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, so 0:59 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair3:29 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:21:42 PB113/697Beat 84%
↑ 181 days after Cardiff 2025 0:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:10 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:16 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →0:16 faster This athlete0:10 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:14356/904Beat 61%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:21:5293/400Beat 77%
↑ 182 days after London 2024 3:27 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:13 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:40 faster for everyone, so 3:27 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:40 faster This athlete1:13 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:23:05153/940Beat 84%