Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Birmingham 2025, the field gained 3:17 on Adam Piergianni.
The races barely moved for everyone else, so 3:31 slower on the clock is close to the whole story.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:19:04765/1035Beat 26%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:35 PB416/1815Beat 77%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:22:27118/156Beat 24%
↑ 172 days after London 2025 3:28 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:09 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:19 faster for everyone: 3:28 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:19 faster This athlete3:09 slower -
London3 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:19:18145/229Beat 37%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025 0:11 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:22 slower on the clock, but the race was 0:33 slower for everyone, so this was 0:11 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:33 slower This athlete0:22 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Men1:18:56 PB90/134Beat 33%