Progress against the field
From Malaga 2024 to Cardiff 2025, the field gained 0:34 on Scott Mcgimpsey.
Over the same races everyone got 3:16 quicker, so 2:42 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 217 days between Birmingham 2024 and Cardiff 2025, still ended 3:38 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:54 PB91/267Beat 66%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:25:58 PB856/1401Beat 39%
↑ 217 days after Birmingham 2024 3:38 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:38 better than the field: 7:16 faster on the clock, against 3:38 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:38 faster This athlete7:16 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:17:00 PB130/143Beat 9%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:33:14549/816Beat 33%
↑ 195 days after Malaga 2024 4:12 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:34 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:22 slower for everyone: 4:12 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:22 slower This athlete4:34 slower -
Malaga13 Apr 2024Individual Open · Men1:28:40357/547Beat 35%
-
Dublin28 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Men1:26:26 PB299/350Beat 15%