Progress against the field
Between Turin 2026 and Stockholm 2026, Emily Banks lost 0:42 to the field.
The clock says 1:08 faster, but the races themselves got 1:50 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
12 races · 11 events
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:13:3620/142Beat 86%
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:05:33 PB9/206Beat 96%
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Individual Pro · Women1:12:56 PB360/751Beat 52%
↑ 139 days after Turin 2026 0:42 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:08 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:50 faster for everyone, so 0:42 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:50 faster This athlete1:08 faster -
Rimini28 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:18:2093/725Beat 87%
-
Berlin22 May 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:06:2816/151Beat 89%
-
Turin30 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:14:0411/106Beat 90%
-
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:07:40 PB12/1122Beat 99%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:06:24 PB31/1599Beat 98%
-
Geneva11 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:11:3212/502Beat 98%
-
Rimini30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:14:0825/510Beat 95%
-
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:13:2918/408Beat 96%
-
St. GallenDate unknownIndividual Open · Women1:16:0543/533Beat 92%