Progress against the field
From Amsterdam 2024 to Maastricht 2026, the field gained 11:08 on ferdy Verweij.
Over the same races everyone got 11:06 quicker, so 0:02 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
16 races · 16 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Individual Open · Men1:07:3377/1119Beat 93%
↑ 128 days after Heerenveen 2026 7:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:07 behind the field: 8:33 slower on the clock, against 1:26 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:26 slower This athlete8:33 slower -
Heerenveen14 May 2026Individual Open · Men59:00 PB2/315Beat 99%
↑ 153 days after Gent 2025 1:55 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:40 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:35 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:55 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:35 faster This athlete2:40 faster -
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:00:03 PB30/674Beat 96%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:05:48 PB95/457Beat 79%
↑ 64 days after Amsterdam 2026 0:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:08 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:19 faster for everyone, so 0:11 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:19 faster This athlete2:08 faster -
Amsterdam21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:07:5650/243Beat 79%
-
Gent12 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:01:4019/1428Beat 99%
↑ 84 days after Maastricht 2025 1:42 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:53 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:35 faster for everyone, so 1:42 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:35 faster This athlete3:53 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:06:15 PB58/105Beat 45%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:3326/1352Beat 98%
↑ 133 days after Heerenveen 2025 2:11 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:53 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:42 slower for everyone: 2:11 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:42 slower This athlete3:53 slower -
Heerenveen9 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:01:408/1217Beat 99%
↑ 34 days after Belgium 2025 1:47 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:47 better than the field: 4:15 faster on the clock, against 2:28 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:28 faster This athlete4:15 faster -
Belgium5 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:5578/1638Beat 95%
↑ 177 days after Amsterdam 2024 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:36 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:36 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 faster This athlete1:36 faster -
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:01 PB16/707Beat 98%
↑ 327 days after Rotterdam 2024, with Sacha Palsgraaf 0:23 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:27 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:23 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:27 faster This pair4:04 faster -
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:07:3188/1539Beat 94%
-
Rimini1 Jun 2024Individual Open · Men1:13:38116/1156Beat 90%
-
Rotterdam6 Apr 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:0542/534Beat 92%
-
Copenhagen23 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:09:4698/686Beat 86%
-
Maastricht20 Jan 2024Individual Open · Men1:16:31155/781Beat 80%