Progress against the field
Between Berlin 2025 and London Excel 2025, Chris Evans and Simon Evans lost 2:38 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 0:55 quicker, so 1:43 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Men, with Simon Evans, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
24 races · 18 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men55:52 PB3/312Beat 99%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:44 PB107/693Beat 85%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 2:02 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:07 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:09 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:02 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This athlete0:07 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Relay · Men56:237/53Beat 87%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men58:0846/302Beat 85%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:5158/533Beat 89%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:23:00708/917Beat 23%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:16:38237/279Beat 15%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Relay · Men57:5718/69Beat 74%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:00:30198/2102Beat 91%
↑ 202 days after Berlin 2025, with Simon Evans 2:38 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:43 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:55 faster for everyone: 2:38 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:55 faster This pair1:43 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:40 PB24/312Beat 92%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Jack Cross 0:03 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 1:47 faster on the clock, against 1:44 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:44 faster This pair1:47 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:2716/176Beat 91%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:02:0014/63Beat 78%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Men58:4746/496Beat 91%
-
Sharjah12 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:57219/576Beat 62%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:16 PB450/733Beat 39%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Relay · Men58:5535/148Beat 76%
-
Bilbao10 Feb 2024Doubles Open · Men1:01:1221/288Beat 93%
-
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Men59:5870/1003Beat 93%
↑ 36 days after Birmingham 2023, with Simon Evans 1:57 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:14 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:17 faster for everyone, so 1:57 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:17 faster This pair4:14 faster -
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Men1:04:1268/467Beat 85%
↑ 266 days after Manchester 2023, with Simon Evans 1:48 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:35 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:23 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:48 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:23 faster This pair1:35 faster -
Manchester28 Jan 2023Doubles Open · Men1:05:4731/229Beat 87%
↑ 105 days after Birmingham 2022, with Simon Evans 0:12 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:46 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:58 slower for everyone: 0:12 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →0:58 slower This pair0:46 slower -
London19 Nov 2022Individual Open · Men1:14:10 PB115/865Beat 87%
-
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Doubles Open · Men1:05:0181/358Beat 77%
-
MelbourneDate unknownDoubles Open · Men1:18:50347/521Beat 33%
-
Singapore ExpoDate unknownDoubles Open · Men1:09:1996/819Beat 88%