Progress against the field
From Manchester 2024 to Cardiff 2026, Eslam Amer got 2:39 faster than the field.
The clock says 13:54 faster, but the races themselves got 11:15 quicker for everyone.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 236 days between Cardiff 2025 and Manchester 2026, cost 3:47 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
18 races · 15 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:13:32285/693Beat 59%
-
Gdansk10 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:13:29 PB96/286Beat 66%
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:17:21175/362Beat 52%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:07238/913Beat 74%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026 7:11 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:11 behind the field: 3:42 slower on the clock, against 3:29 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:29 faster This athlete3:42 slower -
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men58:09 PB22/607Beat 96%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:15:14228/460Beat 50%
↑ 133 days after London Excel 2025 3:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:59 better than the field: 4:32 faster on the clock, against 0:33 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:33 faster This athlete4:32 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · MenDNF—
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:00:3884/794Beat 89%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:11:2579/529Beat 85%
↑ 236 days after Cardiff 2025 3:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:08 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:39 faster for everyone: 3:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:39 faster This athlete1:08 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:19:46303/467Beat 35%
↑ 69 days after Rome 2025 0:32 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:30 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:58 faster for everyone, so 0:32 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:58 faster This athlete3:30 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Pro · Men1:23:16125/199Beat 37%
↑ 133 days after Berlin 2025 2:05 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:14 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:09 slower for everyone: 2:05 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 slower This athlete4:14 slower -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:10:17 PB203/1401Beat 86%
↑ 48 days after Warsaw 2025 4:40 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:04 faster on the clock in a race that was 2:36 slower for everyone: 4:40 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 slower This athlete2:04 faster -
Berlin16 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:19:02141/196Beat 28%
-
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:12:21172/768Beat 78%
↑ 31 days after Glasgow 2025 2:28 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:13 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:41 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:28 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:41 faster This athlete2:13 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:01:23160/947Beat 83%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:14:34423/1588Beat 73%
↑ 123 days after Manchester 2024 11:25 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:25 better than the field: 14:27 faster on the clock, against 3:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete14:27 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:29:01862/1206Beat 29%
-
NiceDate unknownIndividual Pro · Men1:16:23130/236Beat 45%