Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Elizabeth Nairn lost 9:27 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 14:03 quicker, so 4:36 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
9 races · 8 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:07:24 PB13/887Beat 99%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 0:41 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:02 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:43 faster for everyone, so 0:41 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:43 faster This athlete2:02 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:29 PB241/419Beat 43%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:09:269/646Beat 99%
↑ 49 days after Glasgow 2026 1:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:32 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:20 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:32 faster This athlete0:12 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:09:3815/1084Beat 99%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 4:02 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:02 behind the field: 0:28 slower on the clock, against 3:34 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:34 faster This athlete0:28 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:09:1019/825Beat 98%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 1:16 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:16 behind the field: 1:42 slower on the clock, against 0:26 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:26 slower This athlete1:42 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:07:2817/1542Beat 99%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 2:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:04 faster for everyone, so 2:47 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:04 faster This athlete0:17 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:07:458/748Beat 99%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 0:40 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:40 better than the field: 1:24 faster on the clock, against 0:44 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:44 faster This athlete1:24 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:09:0913/830Beat 98%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025 0:01 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 2:51 faster on the clock, against 2:52 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:52 faster This athlete2:51 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:0025/539Beat 95%