Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2024 to Stockholm 2024, Kim Ellis got 4:36 faster than the field.
The clock says 8:29 faster, but the races themselves got 3:53 quicker for everyone.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 237 days between Glasgow 2024 and Birmingham 2024, still ended 4:53 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
11 races · 10 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Relay · Mixed56:156/73Beat 92%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:08:56 PB37/196Beat 81%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:0559/1599Beat 96%
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:10:0211/55Beat 80%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:07:57 PB23/529Beat 96%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:09:2550/1051Beat 95%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:2262/539Beat 89%
-
Stockholm7 Dec 2024Individual Open · Women1:16:45 PB31/348Beat 91%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2024 0:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:32 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:49 faster for everyone, so 0:17 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:49 faster This athlete2:32 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:06 PB34/410Beat 92%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:19:1760/564Beat 89%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024 4:53 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:57 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:04 faster for everyone, so 4:53 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:04 faster This athlete5:57 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women1:25:14233/816Beat 71%