Progress against the field
From London 2025 to Birmingham 2026, Emma Paterson and Charlotte Fox got 3:55 faster than the field.
The clock says 6:54 faster, but the races themselves got 2:59 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Charlotte Fox, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
10 races · 8 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:13:28183/1246Beat 85%
↑ 546 days after London 2025, with Charlotte Fox 3:55 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:54 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:59 faster for everyone, so 3:55 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:59 faster This pair6:54 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:25:30143/196Beat 27%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:40:291257/1618Beat 22%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:20723/1887Beat 62%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Chelsi Russell 1:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:33 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, so 1:57 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair0:33 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:23:07 PB134/222Beat 40%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:10:57 PB66/719Beat 91%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:53127/411Beat 69%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:22423/1118Beat 62%
-
London3 May 2025Relay · Mixed1:12:2174/137Beat 46%
-
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Doubles Open · Women1:12:3166/381Beat 83%