Progress against the field
From London 2025 to Birmingham 2025, the field gained 3:44 on Niamh Curtin.
Over the same races everyone got 1:38 quicker, so 2:06 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:10:03 PB22/265Beat 92%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:22 PB41/1474Beat 97%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025, with Bradley Rennie 1:09 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:59 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:08 faster for everyone, so 1:09 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:08 faster This pair1:59 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:23:03206/829Beat 75%
↑ 172 days after London 2025 3:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:44 behind the field: 2:06 slower on the clock, against 1:38 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:38 faster This athlete2:06 slower -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:2123/470Beat 95%
-
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:20:57 PB300/1368Beat 78%
-
Copenhagen14 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:15256/650Beat 61%