Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Malaga 2026, Ellis James lost 2:09 to the field.
The clock says 0:58 slower, but the races themselves got 1:11 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
9 races · 9 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:25:50659/1246Beat 47%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:10:4713/329Beat 96%
↑ 133 days after London Excel 2025 2:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:58 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:11 faster for everyone: 2:09 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:11 faster This athlete0:58 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:07:53 PB53/314Beat 83%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:09:49 PB48/1542Beat 97%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:12:05 PB120/1118Beat 89%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Women1:14:57 PB6/39Beat 85%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:10:1012/747Beat 98%
-
London26 Nov 2023Individual Open · Women1:10:2822/961Beat 98%
↑ 372 days after London 2022 3:29 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:26 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:57 faster for everyone, so 3:29 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:57 faster This athlete4:26 faster -
London19 Nov 2022Individual Open · Women1:14:5434/411Beat 92%