Progress against the field
Pamela Lewis has dropped 1:00 behind the field from Birmingham 2025 to Birmingham 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 2:48 quicker, so 1:48 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:12:10 PB47/280Beat 83%
↑ 374 days after Birmingham 2025 1:00 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:48 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:48 faster for everyone, so 1:00 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This athlete1:48 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:03:073/1618Beat 100%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed58:56 PB9/460Beat 98%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:03:41 PB18/339Beat 95%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Women1:13:5823/141Beat 84%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:09:49 PB16/830Beat 98%
↑ 47 days after Manchester 2025 1:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:05 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:52 faster for everyone, so 1:47 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:52 faster This athlete1:05 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Women1:10:5419/539Beat 97%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:02:37 PB6/973Beat 99%