Progress against the field
Emma Gregson has dropped 1:26 behind the field from Dublin 2024 to London Excel 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 3:15 quicker, so 1:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:29:15 PB749/1542Beat 51%
↑ 384 days after Dublin 2024 1:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:49 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:15 faster for everyone, so 1:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:15 faster This athlete1:49 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:47 PB108/559Beat 81%
↑ 47 days after Rome 2025, with Adam Smyth 0:46 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:30 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:44 faster for everyone, so 0:46 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:44 faster This pair3:30 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:17259/655Beat 61%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:31:04233/548Beat 58%