Progress against the field
Paul Tuck has dropped 5:24 behind the field from London 2023 to London Excel 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 10:29 quicker, so 5:05 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
Ahead of the field in 3 of 4 comparisons.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:21:201303/2779Beat 53%
↑ 397 days after Poznan 2024 0:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:46 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:47 faster for everyone, so 0:59 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:47 faster This athlete3:46 faster -
Poznan2 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:25:06382/776Beat 51%
↑ 8 days after Birmingham 2024 2:32 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:32 better than the field: 6:47 faster on the clock, against 4:15 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:15 faster This athlete6:47 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:31:531287/1916Beat 33%
↑ 174 days after Sports Direct HYROX London 2024 10:29 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:36 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:07 slower for everyone: 10:29 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:07 slower This athlete10:36 slower -
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Individual Open · Men1:21:17 PB788/1860Beat 58%
↑ 160 days after London 2023 1:34 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:08 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:34 faster for everyone, so 1:34 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:34 faster This athlete5:08 faster -
London26 Nov 2023Individual Open · Men1:26:25959/1865Beat 49%