Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2024 to Glasgow 2025, the field gained 3:57 on Khadine Coleman.
The clock says 0:16 faster, but the races themselves got 4:13 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:22 PB868/1887Beat 54%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:32:45642/904Beat 29%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025, with Danielle Howell 2:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:10 better than the field: 3:22 faster on the clock, against 1:12 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:12 faster This pair3:22 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:36:07460/529Beat 13%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:38:03 PB550/830Beat 34%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024 3:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:13 faster for everyone, which leaves this 3:57 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:13 faster This athlete0:16 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Women1:38:19508/846Beat 40%