Progress against the field
Luke Buckland has gained 1:48 on the field from Cardiff 2025 to Mechelen 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 5:42 quicker, so 7:30 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
21 races · 14 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men52:0413/476Beat 97%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with George Whelan-Davis 0:26 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:43 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:17 faster for everyone, so 0:26 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:17 faster This pair2:43 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men57:26 PB10/693Beat 99%
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men58:5511/478Beat 98%
-
Athens5 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men51:48 PB4/96Beat 96%
-
Athens5 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men58:199/207Beat 96%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men54:4716/302Beat 95%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026, with George Whelan-Davis 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 1:12 faster on the clock, against 1:12 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:12 faster This pair1:12 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:02:3635/533Beat 93%
↑ 49 days after Glasgow 2026 1:27 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:07 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:20 faster for everyone: 1:27 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 faster This athlete1:07 slower -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:4033/493Beat 93%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men56:28 PB1/561Beat 100%
↑ 155 days after Birmingham 2025 0:35 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:31 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:06 faster for everyone, so 0:35 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:06 faster This athlete2:31 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:01:2915/206Beat 93%
-
Turin30 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:02:2615/268Beat 94%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:5919/279Beat 93%
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:00:4712/345Beat 97%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · MenDNF—
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:04:5784/467Beat 82%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men58:5914/1821Beat 99%
↑ 26 days after Rome 2025 0:26 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:26 better than the field: 1:08 faster on the clock, against 0:42 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:42 faster This athlete1:08 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men1:01:09 PB73/775Beat 91%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:00:3221/122Beat 83%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:00:0714/1367Beat 99%
↑ 119 days after Cardiff 2025 1:57 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:57 better than the field: 3:51 faster on the clock, against 1:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:54 faster This athlete3:51 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:5840/1401Beat 97%
-
Red Bull Monday Night shift: HYROX InvitationalDate unknownDoubles Pro · Men53:212/17Beat 88%