Progress against the field
Between Beijing 2025 and Chengdu 2026, 江容 袁 lost 6:02 to the field.
The clock says 3:20 faster, but the races themselves got 9:22 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Hangzhou 2026 → Chengdu 2026: 2:02 in 28 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
14 races · 7 events
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:1338/528Beat 93%
↑ 112 days after Wuhan 2026, with 豪祎 吕 0:38 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:38 better than the field: 1:31 faster on the clock, against 0:53 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:53 faster This pair1:31 faster -
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Relay · Mixed59:198/277Beat 97%
-
Chengdu1 Aug 2026Individual Open · Women1:09:23 PB3/435Beat 99%
↑ 28 days after Hangzhou 2026 2:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:02 better than the field: 2:46 faster on the clock, against 0:44 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:44 faster This athlete2:46 faster -
Hangzhou4 Jul 2026Individual Open · Women1:12:097/390Beat 98%
↑ 105 days after Beijing I 2026 0:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:27 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:47 faster for everyone, so 0:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:47 faster This athlete0:27 faster -
Wuhan11 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:4422/274Beat 92%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:12:3614/633Beat 98%
↑ 91 days after Shenzhen 2025 1:40 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:40 behind the field: 0:35 slower on the clock, against 1:05 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:05 faster This athlete0:35 slower -
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Relay · Mixed1:02:227/289Beat 98%
-
Beijing I21 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:50 PB45/483Beat 91%
-
Shenzhen20 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:177/539Beat 99%
↑ 28 days after Shanghai 2025, with Davide Liu 0:48 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:48 behind the field: 1:19 slower on the clock, against 0:31 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:31 slower This pair1:19 slower -
Shenzhen20 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:018/461Beat 98%
↑ 28 days after Shanghai 2025 0:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:36 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:37 faster for everyone, so 0:59 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This athlete2:36 faster -
Shenzhen20 Dec 2025Relay · Mixed57:594/212Beat 98%
-
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:58 PB7/442Beat 98%
-
Shanghai22 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:14:3719/426Beat 96%
↑ 91 days after Beijing 2025 7:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:54 slower on the clock in a race that was 5:09 faster for everyone: 7:03 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:09 faster This athlete1:54 slower -
Beijing23 Aug 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:435/314Beat 98%