Progress against the field
Between Dublin 2025 and Malaga 2026, Aoife Conroy and Rachel Hogg pulled 9:54 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:27 quicker, so 11:21 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
12 races · 9 events
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:13:14472/689Beat 32%
-
Riga30 May 2026Relay · Women1:05:112/15Beat 87%
-
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:07:1915/73Beat 80%
-
Lisboa1 May 2026Individual Open · Women1:13:2110/245Beat 96%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:18:5291/276Beat 67%
↑ 155 days after Dublin 2025, with Rachel Hogg 9:54 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:54 better than the field: 11:21 faster on the clock, against 1:27 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:27 faster This pair11:21 faster -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:04:10 PB4/1017Beat 100%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:06:00 PB21/133Beat 84%
-
Katowice21 Feb 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:09:1217/47Beat 64%
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:45 PB22/657Beat 97%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:30:13175/262Beat 33%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:15:4623/235Beat 90%
-
Valencia17 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:11:2712/291Beat 96%