Progress against the field
Ryan Wallace has gained 5:34 on the field from Glasgow 2024 to Birmingham 2026.
The clock says 22:57 faster, but the races themselves got 17:23 quicker for everyone.
237 days between Glasgow 2024 and Birmingham 2024 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 10:59 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
13 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:13:02170/677Beat 75%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026 5:01 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:07 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:54 faster for everyone: 5:01 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:54 faster This athlete2:07 slower -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men57:58 PB20/600Beat 97%
-
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:04 PB43/477Beat 91%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Relay · Men55:239/58Beat 85%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:10:5589/595Beat 85%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 0:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:25 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:11 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete2:14 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:13:09312/1463Beat 79%
↑ 39 days after Poznan 2025 4:28 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:49 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:21 slower for everyone: 4:28 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:21 slower This athlete5:49 slower -
Poznan13 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:20 PB82/1184Beat 93%
↑ 52 days after Birmingham 2025 0:55 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:32 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:27 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:55 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:27 faster This athlete0:32 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:52168/1821Beat 91%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 6:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:10 better than the field: 8:46 faster on the clock, against 2:36 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 faster This athlete8:46 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:16:38465/1401Beat 67%
↑ 196 days after Dublin 2024 1:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:51 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:17 faster for everyone, so 1:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:17 faster This athlete1:51 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:07:57393/1105Beat 64%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:18:29426/1221Beat 65%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2024 0:26 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:10 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:44 faster for everyone, so 0:26 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:44 faster This athlete4:10 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:22:39347/816Beat 58%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024 10:59 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
13:20 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:21 faster for everyone, so 10:59 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:21 faster This athlete13:20 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:35:591289/1784Beat 28%