Progress against the field
Between Warsaw 2025 and Glasgow 2026, RYAN MCCANN lost 3:22 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 0:54 quicker, so 2:28 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Cardiff 2025 → Rome 2025: 5:09 in 119 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
8 races · 6 events
-
New York28 May 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:40 PB82/1053Beat 92%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:09:43 PB80/243Beat 67%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:23:14708/1452Beat 51%
↑ 166 days after Rome 2025 9:07 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:07 behind the field: 7:31 slower on the clock, against 1:36 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 faster This athlete7:31 slower -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:43 PB417/1367Beat 70%
↑ 119 days after Cardiff 2025 5:09 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:03 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:54 faster for everyone, so 5:09 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:54 faster This athlete7:03 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:22:46729/1401Beat 48%
↑ 48 days after Warsaw 2025 0:36 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:00 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:36 slower for everyone: 0:36 gained on the field, which the clock hides.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 slower This athlete2:00 slower -
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:46267/715Beat 63%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:34:15703/841Beat 16%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Relay · Men1:09:5628/42Beat 33%