Progress against the field
Phil Hindley has dropped 2:17 behind the field from Cardiff 2025 to Cardiff 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 2:58 quicker, so 0:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
14 races · 13 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:09:53217/693Beat 69%
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:11:08131/478Beat 73%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:11:53148/533Beat 72%
↑ 36 days after London Olympia 2026 2:13 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:26 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:13 slower for everyone: 2:13 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:13 slower This athlete3:26 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:08:27 PB112/445Beat 75%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025 0:54 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:29 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:23 faster for everyone, so 0:54 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 faster This athlete0:29 faster -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:01:02 PB172/455Beat 62%
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:06:01280/958Beat 71%
↑ 377 days after Glasgow 2025 4:36 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:58 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:38 faster for everyone: 4:36 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:38 faster This athlete0:58 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:10:19 PB186/279Beat 33%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:08:56137/462Beat 70%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 1:26 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:21 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:55 faster for everyone, so 1:26 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This athlete3:21 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:12:1757/137Beat 58%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 0:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 0:53 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:36 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:53 faster This athlete0:17 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:12:3436/112Beat 68%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:05:03 PB73/1588Beat 95%
↑ 103 days after London 2024 3:04 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:47 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:51 faster for everyone, so 3:04 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:51 faster This athlete0:47 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:05:5066/1637Beat 96%
↑ 35 days after Birmingham 2024 2:50 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:50 behind the field: 0:10 slower on the clock, against 2:40 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:40 faster This athlete0:10 slower -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:05:4061/1916Beat 97%
↑ 706 days after London 2022 4:13 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:13 better than the field: 8:10 faster on the clock, against 3:57 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:57 faster This athlete8:10 faster -
London19 Nov 2022Individual Open · Men1:13:50106/865Beat 88%