Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Connor Stephenson lost 0:47 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 1:31 quicker, so 0:44 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 331 days between London Excel 2025 and Birmingham 2026, cost 1:22 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
17 races · 14 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men52:36 PB18/476Beat 96%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026, with Jack Lawrence 0:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:38 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:54 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:16 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:54 faster This pair1:38 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:42106/693Beat 85%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 1:22 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:22 behind the field: 0:36 slower on the clock, against 0:46 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:46 faster This athlete0:36 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:01:189/528Beat 98%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026 4:36 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:36 behind the field: 1:07 slower on the clock, against 3:29 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:29 faster This athlete1:07 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed59:38 PB10/887Beat 99%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men53:01 PB1/391Beat 100%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men54:145/66Beat 92%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men59:4861/279Beat 78%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:00:11 PB13/1463Beat 99%
↑ 271 days after Barcelona 2025 1:03 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:41 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:38 faster for everyone, so 1:03 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:38 faster This athlete1:41 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:04:06 PB64/462Beat 86%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 0:52 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:55 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:52 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This athlete1:03 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:255/116Beat 96%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:05:0930/156Beat 81%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 1:27 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:10 slower for everyone: 1:27 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 slower This athlete0:17 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Men54:4612/563Beat 98%
↑ 202 days after Manchester 2024, with Charlie Morris 1:59 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:25 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:24 faster for everyone, so 1:59 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:24 faster This pair2:25 faster -
Barcelona25 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:01:5212/1106Beat 99%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Men1:05:2630/134Beat 78%
-
Stockholm7 Dec 2024Doubles Open · Men56:504/293Beat 99%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men57:1112/719Beat 98%
-
Copenhagen23 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:00:4138/291Beat 87%