Progress against the field
Jack McCormack has gained 0:47 on the field from Paris 2024 to Copenhagen 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 10:33 quicker, so 11:20 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The biggest step was Paris 2024 → Manchester 2025: 6:08 on the field in 76 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
16 races · 12 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:42496/1159Beat 57%
↑ 283 days after Manchester 2026, with Chloe McCormack 4:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:34 behind the field: 1:47 slower on the clock, against 2:47 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:47 faster This pair1:47 slower -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:27:31 PB530/693Beat 24%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:12:20 PB71/365Beat 81%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:05:12 PB205/484Beat 58%
-
Copenhagen13 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:42187/900Beat 79%
↑ 51 days after Manchester 2026 3:48 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:54 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:06 faster for everyone, so 3:48 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:06 faster This athlete6:54 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:55309/824Beat 63%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025, with Chloe McCormack 0:45 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:46 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:01 faster for everyone, so 0:45 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:01 faster This pair1:46 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:22:36241/551Beat 56%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 0:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:01 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:07 slower for everyone: 0:54 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete2:01 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:351252/2779Beat 55%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 7:58 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:56 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:02 faster for everyone: 7:58 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete4:56 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:41365/889Beat 59%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025, with Chloe McCormack 5:52 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:52 behind the field: 4:26 slower on the clock, against 1:26 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:26 faster This pair4:26 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:39449/1821Beat 75%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 5:04 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:04 better than the field: 7:40 faster on the clock, against 2:36 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 faster This athlete7:40 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:23:19753/1401Beat 46%
↑ 126 days after Manchester 2025 5:21 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:22 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:59 faster for everyone: 5:21 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:59 faster This athlete3:22 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:10 PB259/947Beat 73%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:15 PB197/861Beat 77%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:19:57520/1191Beat 56%
↑ 76 days after Paris 2024 6:08 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:05 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:57 faster for everyone, so 6:08 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:57 faster This athlete7:05 faster -
Paris9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:27:02841/1585Beat 47%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:28:25518/850Beat 39%