Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 9:14 on Ali Standerwick.
Over the same races everyone got 4:50 quicker, so 4:24 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:07:10 PB47/1246Beat 96%
↑ 221 days after London Olympia 2026, with Lou Rowe-Alleyne 2:56 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:56 better than the field: 4:30 faster on the clock, against 1:34 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair4:30 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:03 PB123/848Beat 86%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:11:4089/867Beat 90%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:22:02431/1542Beat 72%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 8:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:02 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:04 faster for everyone: 8:06 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:04 faster This athlete5:02 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:00 PB85/829Beat 90%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 1:08 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:38 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:46 faster for everyone, so 1:08 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 faster This athlete0:38 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:3897/587Beat 84%