Progress against the field
From Katowice 2025 to Manchester 2026, the field gained 0:38 on Andrew Williams.
The clock says 9:06 faster, but the races themselves got 9:44 quicker for everyone.
The biggest step was Glasgow 2025 → Warsaw 2025: 24:56 on the field in 31 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
21 races · 16 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:03:04 PB81/693Beat 88%
-
Oslo26 Sep 2026Individual Pro · Men1:03:5230/273Beat 89%
-
Riga30 May 2026Doubles Open · Men55:2510/423Beat 98%
-
Riga30 May 2026Individual Pro · MenDNF—
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:2752/533Beat 90%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men59:5513/1452Beat 99%
-
Vienna6 Feb 2026Individual Open · Men59:17 PB5/1311Beat 100%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:20:51614/794Beat 23%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:00:4820/1463Beat 99%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 1:22 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:15 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:07 slower for everyone: 1:22 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete0:15 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men53:57 PB13/1815Beat 99%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Steven Craig 0:41 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:32 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:51 faster for everyone, so 0:41 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:51 faster This pair2:32 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:01:0354/2779Beat 98%
↑ 54 days after Geneva 2025 3:08 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:08 better than the field: 6:41 faster on the clock, against 3:33 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:33 faster This athlete6:41 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Pro · Men58:42 PB6/167Beat 96%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men56:2933/1099Beat 97%
-
Geneva11 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:4486/1386Beat 94%
↑ 15 days after Rome 2025 3:14 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:13 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:59 faster for everyone, so 3:14 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:59 faster This athlete4:13 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:11:57284/1367Beat 79%
↑ 146 days after London 2025 5:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:22 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:12 faster for everyone: 5:34 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:12 faster This athlete5:22 slower -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:06:35148/1917Beat 92%
↑ 21 days after Warsaw 2025 1:36 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:36 behind the field: 2:18 slower on the clock, against 0:42 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:42 slower This athlete2:18 slower -
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:04:1732/715Beat 96%
↑ 31 days after Glasgow 2025 24:56 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
24:56 better than the field: 29:37 faster on the clock, against 4:41 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:41 faster This athlete29:37 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:33:541138/1445Beat 21%
↑ 18 days after Katowice 2025 26:08 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
26:08 behind the field: 24:00 slower on the clock, against 2:08 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:08 faster This athlete24:00 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men55:5737/947Beat 96%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:11:08261/1588Beat 84%
-
Katowice22 Feb 2025Individual Open · Men1:09:5499/757Beat 87%