Progress against the field
Between Rotterdam 2026 and Stockholm 2026, Seanan Mccolgan pulled 3:34 ahead of the field.
The clock says 2:16 faster, but the races themselves got 1:18 slower for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
12 races · 12 events
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Individual Pro · Men1:03:43233/767Beat 70%
↑ 64 days after Rotterdam 2026 3:34 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 1:18 slower for everyone and the clock still says 2:16 faster: 3:34 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:18 slower This athlete2:16 faster -
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men1:05:5934/348Beat 90%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:1630/206Beat 85%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 2:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:09 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:25 faster for everyone, so 2:16 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete0:09 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:04:2515/193Beat 92%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 0:42 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:42 behind the field: 3:31 slower on the clock, against 2:49 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:49 slower This athlete3:31 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:00:54 PB28/467Beat 94%
↑ 69 days after Rome 2025 2:23 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:21 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:58 faster for everyone, so 2:23 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:58 faster This athlete5:21 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Pro · Men1:06:1528/199Beat 86%
-
Cologne10 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:01:02 PB12/1182Beat 99%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:1347/1445Beat 97%
↑ 123 days after Paris 2024 2:13 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:47 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:00 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:13 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:00 faster This athlete0:47 faster -
Paris9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:04:0027/1585Beat 98%
↑ 30 days after Amsterdam 2024 2:11 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:11 behind the field: 1:39 slower on the clock, against 0:32 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:32 faster This athlete1:39 slower -
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:02:2127/1539Beat 98%
↑ 348 days after Dublin 2023 2:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:50 faster on the clock, yet the race was 14:48 faster for everyone, so 2:58 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →14:48 faster This athlete11:50 faster -
Dublin28 Oct 2023Individual Open · Men1:14:1140/777Beat 95%
-
World ChampionshipsDate unknownIndividual Pro · Men1:07:00243/522Beat 53%