Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and London Olympia 2026, Rachel Cox lost 1:45 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:23 quicker, so 2:38 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:13:47 PB190/1246Beat 85%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:20:31 PB209/301Beat 31%
-
Barcelona14 May 2026Doubles Open · Women1:25:50180/321Beat 44%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:24:11 PB177/758Beat 77%
↑ 153 days after Birmingham 2025 1:45 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:38 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:23 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:45 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:23 faster This athlete2:38 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:23:46 PB128/283Beat 55%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025 15:12 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
16:34 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:22 faster for everyone, so 15:12 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:22 faster This athlete16:34 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:39:09942/1111Beat 15%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:26:49293/829Beat 65%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Women1:40:2092/114Beat 19%