Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and EMEA London Olympia 2026, Bethan Fowler lost 4:58 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:51 quicker, so 0:53 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
17 races · 14 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:18:10100/280Beat 64%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 5:28 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:28 behind the field: 3:35 slower on the clock, against 1:53 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:53 faster This athlete3:35 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Women1:14:3537/231Beat 84%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026 2:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:51 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:27 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:36 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:27 faster This athlete0:51 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:08:529/758Beat 99%
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:08:5389/507Beat 82%
↑ 298 days after Cardiff 2025 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 3:11 faster on the clock, against 3:11 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:11 faster This athlete3:11 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Women1:15:2625/146Beat 83%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 0:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 2:23 slower on the clock, against 2:19 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:19 slower This athlete2:23 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:07:42 PB49/1599Beat 97%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:13:03 PB50/315Beat 84%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:2939/1111Beat 97%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:07:5722/529Beat 96%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:12:0415/400Beat 96%
↑ 27 days after London 2025 2:34 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:04 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:30 faster for everyone: 2:34 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:30 faster This athlete1:04 slower -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:11:0048/1368Beat 97%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025 2:24 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:24 behind the field: 1:14 slower on the clock, against 1:10 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:10 faster This athlete1:14 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:09:4618/649Beat 97%
-
Copenhagen23 Mar 2024Individual Open · Women1:05:18 PB2/326Beat 99%
-
Fort Lauderdale24 Feb 2024Individual Open · Women1:07:244/198Beat 98%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Individual Open · Women1:11:307/532Beat 99%
↑ 266 days after Manchester 2023 0:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:13 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:32 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:19 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:32 faster This athlete2:13 faster -
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Relay · Mixed1:11:1022/57Beat 61%
-
Manchester28 Jan 2023Individual Open · Women1:13:4313/281Beat 95%