Progress against the field
Between Amsterdam 2024 and Birmingham 2026, Cameron Henderson pulled 2:24 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 13:44 quicker, so 16:08 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 221 days between EMEA London Olympia 2026 and Birmingham 2026, cost 3:11 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
11 races · 10 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:08:1794/677Beat 86%
↑ 221 days after EMEA London Olympia 2026 3:11 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:24 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:47 faster for everyone: 3:11 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:47 faster This athlete2:24 slower -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:05:53277/958Beat 71%
↑ 62 days after Manchester 2026 3:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:36 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:08 faster for everyone: 3:44 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:08 faster This athlete0:36 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:05:1727/551Beat 95%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 1:23 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:30 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:07 slower for everyone: 1:23 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete2:30 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:26 PB38/312Beat 88%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:02:47 PB63/2771Beat 98%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 1:10 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:12 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:02 faster for everyone, so 1:10 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete4:12 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:06:59107/1600Beat 93%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 1:49 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:47 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:36 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:49 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 faster This athlete0:47 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:46123/1401Beat 91%
↑ 27 days after London 2025 1:08 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:08 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:00 slower for everyone: 1:08 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:00 slower This athlete0:08 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:07:54200/1917Beat 90%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025 0:52 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:15 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:07 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:52 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:07 faster This athlete1:15 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:09:09174/1588Beat 89%
↑ 103 days after London 2024 2:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:51 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:51 faster for everyone, so 2:00 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:51 faster This athlete5:51 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:15:00333/1637Beat 80%
↑ 50 days after Amsterdam 2024 9:05 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:25 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:20 faster for everyone, so 9:05 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 faster This athlete9:25 faster -
Amsterdam10 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:24:25709/1539Beat 54%