Progress against the field
Between London 2025 and London Olympia 2026, Harley Freedman lost 9:34 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:37 quicker, so 5:57 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Birmingham 2025 → London Excel 2025: 2:42 in 43 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
11 races · 9 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men1:21:45288/445Beat 35%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025 5:30 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:07 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:23 faster for everyone: 5:30 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 faster This athlete4:07 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:17:38270/467Beat 42%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 2:42 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:37 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:55 faster for everyone, so 2:42 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This athlete4:37 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:20 PB12/401Beat 97%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2025, with Karina Jakovenko 1:02 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:27 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:29 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:02 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:29 faster This pair0:27 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:4731/954Beat 97%
↑ 26 days after Rome 2025, with Karina Jakovenko 0:43 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 better than the field: 2:17 faster on the clock, against 1:34 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair2:17 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:22:15100/137Beat 27%
↑ 172 days after London 2025 6:46 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:46 behind the field: 6:27 slower on the clock, against 0:19 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:19 faster This athlete6:27 slower -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:0411/427Beat 97%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:52175/639Beat 73%
↑ 70 days after Malaga 2025 4:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:09 behind the field: 4:47 slower on the clock, against 0:38 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:38 slower This athlete4:47 slower -
London3 May 2025Relay · Mixed1:06:2139/137Beat 72%
-
London3 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:15:48 PB112/229Beat 51%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:11:05 PB207/966Beat 79%
↑ 56 days after Manchester 2025 5:19 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:19 better than the field: 7:32 faster on the clock, against 2:13 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:13 faster This athlete7:32 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:18:37471/1191Beat 61%