Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Glasgow 2026, Rachel MacPhail got 0:23 faster than the field.
The clock says 3:49 faster, but the races themselves got 3:26 quicker for everyone.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 267 days between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025, still ended 3:32 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
8 races · 4 events
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:26:50705/1618Beat 56%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:12:2218/126Beat 86%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:20:0533/318Beat 90%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025 3:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:49 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:20 faster for everyone: 3:09 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 faster This athlete2:49 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:31:11 PB1196/1474Beat 19%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:16 PB219/1542Beat 86%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025 3:32 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:38 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:06 faster for everyone, so 3:32 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:06 faster This athlete6:38 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:30226/796Beat 72%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Women1:23:54240/830Beat 71%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Women1:19:56 PB213/1029Beat 79%