Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2022 and Manchester 2023, Rachel Ackers and Miriam Gannon lost 0:17 to the field.
The clock says 2:06 slower, but the races themselves got 1:49 slower for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
10 races · 10 events
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:05:02 PB9/150Beat 94%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Pro · Women1:05:444/75Beat 95%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Pro · Women1:06:054/80Beat 95%
-
Vienna - European Championship9 Feb 2024Doubles Open · Women1:02:48 PB5/158Beat 97%
-
Dublin28 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:38 PB6/255Beat 98%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Women1:03:424/460Beat 99%
-
Manchester28 Jan 2023Doubles Open · Women1:08:536/291Beat 98%
↑ 105 days after Birmingham 2022, with Miriam Gannon 0:17 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:17 behind the field: 2:06 slower on the clock, against 1:49 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:49 slower This pair2:06 slower -
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Doubles Open · Women1:06:4710/309Beat 97%
-
Manchester29 Jan 2022Doubles Open · Women1:10:1720/129Beat 85%
-
World Championships NiceDate unknownDoubles Pro · Women1:14:13260/361Beat 28%