Progress against the field
Between Cardiff 2025 and Dublin 2025, Gracious Van Den Berg-Slowey lost 3:11 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:14 quicker, so 0:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
13 races · 12 events
-
Stockholm18 Jun 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:04:15134/689Beat 81%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:17 PB36/1198Beat 97%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:10:17 PB19/1084Beat 98%
-
Turin30 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:03:06 PB4/81Beat 95%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:02:45 PB8/1155Beat 99%
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:04:258/91Beat 91%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Pro · Women1:21:5627/92Beat 71%
↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2025 3:15 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:15 behind the field: 1:48 slower on the clock, against 1:27 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:27 faster This athlete1:48 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Women1:20:08 PB31/138Beat 78%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 0:04 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:51 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:47 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →1:47 faster This athlete1:51 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Women1:21:5929/113Beat 74%
-
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Individual Pro · Women1:25:2312/26Beat 54%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:26:02355/492Beat 28%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:15:16148/973Beat 85%
-
Rotterdam6 Apr 2024Individual Open · Women1:24:44135/585Beat 77%