Progress against the field
From Cardiff 2026 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 1:33 on Sian Gallagher and Jack Gallagher.
The clock says 0:04 faster, but the races themselves got 1:37 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Jack Gallagher, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
20 races · 17 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:45182/560Beat 68%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Jack Gallagher 1:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:37 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:33 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This pair0:04 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:49163/419Beat 61%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Women1:45:36209/231Beat 10%
↑ 189 days after Birmingham 2025 11:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:44 behind the field: 9:20 slower on the clock, against 2:24 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:24 faster This athlete9:20 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:19:30 PB128/404Beat 68%
↑ 153 days after Birmingham 2025, with Claire Cochrane 6:34 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:16 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:42 faster for everyone, so 6:34 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:42 faster This pair9:16 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:36:23 PB801/1379Beat 42%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:28:46555/904Beat 39%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:24:06 PB119/163Beat 27%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Women1:36:16 PB93/138Beat 33%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 0:31 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:16 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:47 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:31 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:47 faster This athlete1:16 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Women1:37:3282/113Beat 27%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:56 PB306/892Beat 66%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:24294/956Beat 69%
↑ 99 days after Manchester 2025, with Jack Gallagher 1:26 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:26 better than the field: 5:05 faster on the clock, against 3:39 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:39 faster This pair5:05 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:29350/733Beat 52%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · MixedDNF—
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:32119/492Beat 76%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:06177/664Beat 73%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:43234/894Beat 74%
↑ 334 days after London 2023, with Jack Gallagher 1:48 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:48 better than the field: 2:01 faster on the clock, against 0:13 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:13 faster This pair2:01 faster -
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:44304/909Beat 67%
↑ 36 days after Birmingham 2023, with Jack Gallagher 1:07 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:26 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:33 faster for everyone, so 1:07 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:33 faster This pair3:26 faster -
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:10130/352Beat 63%
-
London19 Nov 2022Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:18118/256Beat 54%
-
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:05110/257Beat 57%