Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Louis Ambert and Emily Rossiter lost 1:45 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:42 quicker, so 2:57 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Emily Rossiter, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
16 races · 10 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed59:01 PB13/586Beat 98%
↑ 283 days after Manchester 2026, with Emily Rossiter 1:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:31 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:47 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:16 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:47 faster This pair1:31 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:01:4316/646Beat 98%
↑ 533 days after Berlin 2025 2:14 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:14 behind the field: 0:27 slower on the clock, against 1:47 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:47 faster This athlete0:27 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Relay · Mixed1:15:0138/71Beat 47%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:3229/824Beat 97%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025, with Emily Rossiter 0:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:11 slower on the clock, and the race was 1:08 slower for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →1:08 slower This pair1:11 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men56:4925/794Beat 97%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed59:2124/1372Beat 98%
↑ 314 days after Manchester 2025, with Emily Rossiter 0:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:37 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:03 faster for everyone, so 0:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:03 faster This pair2:37 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:1329/594Beat 95%
↑ 368 days after Paris 2024, with Suzi Archer 2:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:33 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:44 faster for everyone, so 2:11 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:44 faster This pair1:33 faster -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men56:35 PB16/667Beat 98%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:01:16 PB46/1851Beat 98%
↑ 188 days after Paris 2024 1:32 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:43 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 7:15 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:32 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →7:15 faster This athlete5:43 faster -
Toulouse8 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Men56:4711/955Beat 99%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:01:5847/733Beat 94%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Relay · Men51:286/148Beat 96%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:04:4615/664Beat 98%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:06:5977/1585Beat 95%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men56:549/875Beat 99%
-
Rotterdam20 May 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:07:5513/187Beat 93%