Progress against the field
From Manchester 2026 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 3:17 on Dan Jackson.
The clock says 1:45 faster, but the races themselves got 5:02 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
26 races · 20 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men58:0914/693Beat 98%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 0:57 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:09 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:57 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This athlete1:12 faster -
Geneva9 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men52:566/353Beat 98%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:05:42130/522Beat 75%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:1817/302Beat 94%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Men59:2111/533Beat 98%
↑ 36 days after London Olympia 2026 1:00 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:00 behind the field: 2:13 slower on the clock, against 1:13 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:13 slower This athlete2:13 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men50:47 PB4/484Beat 99%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men57:08 PB7/445Beat 98%
↑ 13 days after Glasgow 2026 0:13 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:54 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:41 faster for everyone, so 0:13 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:41 faster This athlete1:54 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Pro · Men59:025/140Beat 96%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 1:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:52 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:25 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:33 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete0:52 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men59:549/130Beat 93%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:55509/2102Beat 76%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:06:03325/1177Beat 72%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men57:42 PB2/523Beat 100%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Pro · Men1:00:308/199Beat 96%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Men59:115/225Beat 98%
↑ 79 days after Glasgow 2025 1:55 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:45 slower for everyone and the clock still says 1:10 faster: 1:55 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:45 slower This athlete1:10 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed56:23 PB2/956Beat 100%
-
Paris 118 Apr 2025Doubles Pro · Men53:2221/438Beat 95%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Men1:00:2111/134Beat 92%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Men1:08:37237/616Beat 62%
↑ 328 days after Glasgow 2024, with Rob Smith 3:48 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:48 behind the field: 0:43 slower on the clock, against 3:05 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:05 faster This pair0:43 slower -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:14:26473/719Beat 34%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Pro · Men54:262/83Beat 98%
-
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:49354/925Beat 62%
-
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Relay · Men54:112/50Beat 96%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:07:54225/787Beat 71%
-
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Men56:53 PB26/1003Beat 97%
-
World Championships NiceDate unknownDoubles Pro · Men56:1430/387Beat 92%
-
World Championships ManchesterDate unknownDoubles Open · Men58:5535/250Beat 86%