Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2022 and Birmingham 2026, Martin Garnett lost 11:09 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 17:48 quicker, so 6:39 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 616 days between Vienna 2025 and Birmingham 2026, cost 1:54 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
22 races · 18 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:03:3558/1442Beat 96%
↑ 616 days after Vienna 2025 1:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:39 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:45 slower for everyone: 1:54 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:45 slower This athlete2:39 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men55:12 PB23/1815Beat 99%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Pro · Men57:1635/312Beat 89%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025, with David Sloan 3:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:03 behind the field: 1:23 slower on the clock, against 1:40 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:40 faster This pair1:23 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Pro · Men1:07:42 PB32/137Beat 77%
↑ 172 days after London 2025 2:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:00 better than the field: 2:19 faster on the clock, against 0:19 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:19 faster This athlete2:19 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:539/93Beat 90%
-
London3 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:10:0177/229Beat 66%
↑ 364 days after Sports Direct HYROX London 2024 5:42 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:07 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:35 faster for everyone: 5:42 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:35 faster This athlete2:07 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Pro · Men55:36 PB20/143Beat 86%
-
Vienna22 Feb 2025Relay · Men52:307/39Beat 82%
-
Vienna22 Feb 2025Individual Open · Men1:00:56 PB89/1356Beat 93%
↑ 29 days after Manchester 2025 0:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:23 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:40 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:17 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:40 faster This athlete3:23 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Relay · Men1:01:2952/148Beat 65%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:04:1959/1191Beat 95%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2024 4:40 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:48 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:52 faster for everyone: 4:40 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:52 faster This athlete0:48 slower -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Pro · Men57:5717/83Beat 80%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Relay · Men57:331/13Beat 92%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:03:3133/1916Beat 98%
↑ 237 days after Glasgow 2024 1:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:34 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:21 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:47 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:21 faster This athlete0:34 faster -
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Individual Pro · Men1:07:5432/237Beat 87%
↑ 160 days after London 2023 1:47 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:26 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:13 faster for everyone, so 1:47 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:13 faster This athlete0:26 faster -
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:04:0527/1784Beat 99%
↑ 133 days after Birmingham 2023 4:44 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:28 slower on the clock in a race that was 4:16 faster for everyone: 4:44 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:16 faster This athlete0:28 slower -
London26 Nov 2023Individual Pro · Men1:08:2042/321Beat 87%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Individual Open · Men1:03:379/1182Beat 99%
↑ 252 days after Glasgow 2023 2:29 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 faster on the clock in a race that was 1:46 slower for everyone: 2:29 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:46 slower This athlete0:43 faster -
Glasgow11 Feb 2023Individual Open · Men1:04:2030/974Beat 97%
↑ 14 days after Manchester 2023 0:04 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 5:56 faster on the clock, against 5:52 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →5:52 faster This athlete5:56 faster -
Manchester28 Jan 2023Individual Open · Men1:10:1636/649Beat 95%
↑ 105 days after Birmingham 2022 0:20 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:20 behind the field: 0:02 slower on the clock, against 0:18 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:18 faster This athlete0:02 slower -
Birmingham15 Oct 2022Individual Open · Men1:10:1466/960Beat 93%
-
World Championships ManchesterDate unknownIndividual Pro · Men1:13:20218/432Beat 50%